Curious about DeepSeek and how it stacks up against ChatGPT? I’ve tested both thoroughly to help you decide which AI chatbot ...

Under DeepSeeks' projections, SOL and Little Pepe could outperform expectations dramatically, and here’s why investors are ...

Winner: DeepSeek wins for analytical clarity, emotional punch, and memorable phrasing. The chatbot not only compares but interprets the leadership of Mandela and Jobs in a way that resonates. 4.

Winner: Qwen 2.5 for its more structured, readable and intuitive response while maintaining accuracy. DeepSeek offered an accurate response, but could improve its readability and conciseness. 3.

Winner: DeepSeek wins for a more creative, age-appropriate guide offering strategies that are both practical and emotionally attuned to how a nervous 10-year-old might feel. 3.

In addition to problematic censorship and data collection policies, DeepSeek falls short on features and performance. There are better AI chatbots out there.

DeepSeek has helped show that this system can create winners. Yann LeCun, Meta’s chief A.I. scientist, said the stock market slide fundamentally misunderstands the investment case around the ...

Winner: While o1 Pro made a good showing, the sheer wild absurdity of the DeepSeek R1 response won us over. Hidden code DeepSeek R1 "hidden code" prompt response.

I've been subjecting chatbots to a set of real-world programming tests for over two years. There are now five I recommend if ...

DeepSeek doesn’t have AI assistants. Winner: ChatGPT. Context Windows and Usage Caps. ChatGPT and DeepSeek both have context windows of up to 128,000 tokens.

I just tested the newest versions of ChatGPT vs Gemini vs DeepSeek vs Claude — and the winner completely surprised me. This underrated chatbot is surprisingly good — 5 prompts to see for yourself.